Käse Gouda jung vs Gouda Holland jung
Overall, Gouda Holland jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Käse Gouda jung | Gouda Holland jung |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 365 kcal |
| Fat | 30.4 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.8 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Käse Gouda jung
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Farbstoff: Annatto Norbixin*; Konservierungsstoff: Natamycin. Auf natürliche Weise laktosefrei.
Gouda Holland jung
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Salz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Konservierungsstoff: Natamycin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Käse Gouda jung or Gouda Holland jung?
Overall, Gouda Holland jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda Holland jung has fewer calories: 365 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Käse Gouda jung has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.