Comparison

Gouda Holland jung vs Gouda jung

Overall, Gouda jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGouda Holland jungGouda jung
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 365 kcal 344 kcal
Fat 31 g 27.9 g
Saturated fat 21 g 19.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.9 g 2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 23 g 23.1 g
Additives10
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gouda jung has 10% less fat (27.9 g vs 31 g).

Ingredients

Gouda Holland jung

Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Salz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Konservierungsstoff: Natamycin

Gouda jung

Käsereimilch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab. Unter Schutzatmosphäre verpackt. Nach dem Öffnen innerhalb weniger Tage verzehren. A-ware Packaging B.V. Wittevrouwen 2-4 1358 CD Almere Niederlande Fragen zum Produkt: [email protected] www.rewe.de/kontakt 400 ge Durchschnittliche Nährwerte pro pro 100g Portion* Energie 1425kJ 470kJ 344 kcal 113 kcal Fett 27,9g 9,2g

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gouda Holland jung or Gouda jung?

Overall, Gouda jung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gouda jung has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gouda Holland jung has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons