Comparison
Goldlocken vs Tilapia
Overall, Goldlocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goldlocken | Tilapia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 116 kcal | 201 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 9.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Goldlocken has 42% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 201 kcal).
- Goldlocken has 76% less fat (2.4 g vs 9.9 g).
- Goldlocken has no sugar, while Tilapia has 0.5 g.
- Tilapia has 74% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Goldlocken has 28% more protein (23.5 g vs 17 g).
- Tilapia has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Goldlocken lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Goldlocken
Tilapiafilet, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch, Schutzkultur
Tilapia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goldlocken or Tilapia?
Overall, Goldlocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Goldlocken has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 201 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Goldlocken has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.