Garlic facaccine vs Stoneless olives
Overall, Garlic facaccine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garlic facaccine | Stoneless olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 125 kcal |
| Fat | 10.1 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | — |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Stoneless olives has 56% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Garlic facaccine has 22% less fat (10.1 g vs 13 g).
- Garlic facaccine has 41% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Stoneless olives has no sugar, while Garlic facaccine has 3.3 g.
- Garlic facaccine has 36% less salt (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Garlic facaccine has 55% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Garlic facaccine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Stoneless olives is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Garlic facaccine
Water, Pitted Black Olives, Salt, Stabiliser: Ferrous Gluconate.
Stoneless olives
Black Olives (50%), Water, Sea Salt Stabiliser (Ferrous Gluconate). May contain stones
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garlic facaccine or Stoneless olives?
Overall, Garlic facaccine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Stoneless olives has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stoneless olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.