Galette de mais vs Cornflakes nature
Overall, Galette de mais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Galette de mais | Cornflakes nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 379 kcal | 375 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 5.9 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cornflakes nature has 82% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Cornflakes nature has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Galette de mais has 80% less sugar (1.2 g vs 5.9 g).
- Galette de mais has 72% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Galette de mais has 42% more fiber (6.6 g vs 3.8 g).
- Galette de mais has 12% more protein (8.9 g vs 7.8 g).
- Galette de mais has the better Nutri-Score.
- Galette de mais is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cornflakes nature lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Galette de mais
corn* 99,5%, salt, possible traces of soy, lupine, gluten, *ingredient from organic farming,
Cornflakes nature
Maize, sugar, barley malt extract, salt, emulsifier: mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids, vitamins: niacin (PP), pantothenic acid (B5), B6, riboflavin (B2), thiamin (B1), folic acid (B9), biotin (H), B12, iron. May contain traces of soya, milk products and nuts.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Galette de mais or Cornflakes nature?
Overall, Galette de mais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cornflakes nature has fewer calories: 375 kcal versus 379 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galette de mais has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.