Comparison
Galbanetto vs Speck
Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Galbanetto | Speck |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 305 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 9.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galbanetto has 13% less fat (21 g vs 24 g).
- Galbanetto has 17% less saturated fat (8 g vs 9.6 g).
- Galbanetto has 32% less salt (2.7 g vs 4 g).
Ingredients
Galbanetto
Not available.
Speck
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Galbanetto or Speck?
Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galbanetto has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galbanetto has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.