Coppa stagionata vs Galbanetto
Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coppa stagionata | Galbanetto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.4 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galbanetto has 16% fewer calories (305 kcal vs 361 kcal).
- Galbanetto has 28% less fat (21 g vs 29 g).
- Galbanetto has 15% less saturated fat (8 g vs 9.4 g).
- Galbanetto has 32% less salt (2.7 g vs 4 g).
- Galbanetto has 17% more protein (29 g vs 24 g).
Ingredients
Coppa stagionata
coppa di sulno, sale, spezie, antiossidante: E301, conservanti: E252, E250.
Galbanetto
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coppa stagionata or Galbanetto?
Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galbanetto has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coppa stagionata has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.