Frosted Flakes vs Crackling oatbran
Overall, Crackling oatbran has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frosted Flakes | Crackling oatbran |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 541 kcal | 411 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 59.5 g | 28.6 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 12.5 g |
| Protein | 21.6 g | 26.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crackling oatbran has 24% fewer calories (411 kcal vs 541 kcal).
- Frosted Flakes has no fat, while Crackling oatbran has 6.3 g.
- Frosted Flakes has no saturated fat, while Crackling oatbran has 6.3 g.
- Crackling oatbran has 52% less sugar (28.6 g vs 59.5 g).
- Crackling oatbran has 84% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Crackling oatbran has 78% more fiber (12.5 g vs 2.7 g).
- Crackling oatbran has 19% more protein (26.8 g vs 21.6 g).
- Crackling oatbran has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Crackling oatbran lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Frosted Flakes
Milled corn, sugar, malt flavor, contains 2% or less of salt. Vitamins and Minerals: Iron (ferric phosphate), niacinamide, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride), vitamin B2 (riboflavin), vitamin B1 (thiamin hydrochloride), folic acid, vitamin D3, vitamin B12.
Crackling oatbran
Kellous Sales LLC
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frosted Flakes or Crackling oatbran?
Overall, Crackling oatbran has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crackling oatbran has fewer calories: 411 kcal versus 541 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crackling oatbran has less sugar: 28.6 g versus 59.5 g per 100 g.