Comparison

Flocons 5 céréales vs Nestum Cereais Pro

Overall, Flocons 5 céréales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlocons 5 céréalesNestum Cereais Pro
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 348 kcal 392 kcal
Fat 3.8 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.1 g 10.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 10 g 8.5 g
Protein 10 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Flocons 5 céréales has 11% fewer calories (348 kcal vs 392 kcal).
  • Nestum Cereais Pro has 21% less fat (3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Flocons 5 céréales has 90% less sugar (1.1 g vs 10.5 g).
  • Flocons 5 céréales has 78% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Flocons 5 céréales has 15% more fiber (10 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Nestum Cereais Pro has 60% more protein (25 g vs 10 g).
  • Flocons 5 céréales is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Flocons 5 céréales

Flocons de blé complet 25%, Flocons d'avoine complète 25%, Flocons d'orge complet 25%, Flocons de seigle complet 12,5%, Flocons de maïs toastés 12,5

Nestum Cereais Pro

Farinha de cereais e de proteína de ervilha Ingredientes: Farinha de TRIGO parcialmente hidrolisada (78,1%), farinha de proteína de ervilha (15,8%), inulina, farinha de gérmen de semente de alfarroba, carbonato de cálcio, vitaminas (C, niacina, ácido pantoténico, tiamina, B6, riboflavina, ácido fólico, B12), ferro reduzido, aroma natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flocons 5 céréales or Nestum Cereais Pro?

Overall, Flocons 5 céréales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flocons 5 céréales has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Flocons 5 céréales has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 10.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons