Comparison

Flocons de sarrasin vs Nestum Cereais Pro

Overall, Flocons de sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlocons de sarrasinNestum Cereais Pro
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 351 kcal 392 kcal
Fat 3.9 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.5 g 10.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 8.5 g 8.5 g
Protein 16 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Flocons de sarrasin has 10% fewer calories (351 kcal vs 392 kcal).
  • Nestum Cereais Pro has 23% less fat (3 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Nestum Cereais Pro has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Flocons de sarrasin has 86% less sugar (1.5 g vs 10.5 g).
  • Flocons de sarrasin has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Nestum Cereais Pro has 36% more protein (25 g vs 16 g).
  • Flocons de sarrasin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Nestum Cereais Pro lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Flocons de sarrasin

Flocons de sarrasin*. *Ingrédient issu de l'Agriculture Biologique.

Nestum Cereais Pro

Farinha de cereais e de proteína de ervilha Ingredientes: Farinha de TRIGO parcialmente hidrolisada (78,1%), farinha de proteína de ervilha (15,8%), inulina, farinha de gérmen de semente de alfarroba, carbonato de cálcio, vitaminas (C, niacina, ácido pantoténico, tiamina, B6, riboflavina, ácido fólico, B12), ferro reduzido, aroma natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flocons de sarrasin or Nestum Cereais Pro?

Overall, Flocons de sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flocons de sarrasin has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Flocons de sarrasin has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 10.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons