Flapjack s brusinkami vs Rolled oats & mango
Overall, Rolled oats & mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flapjack s brusinkami | Rolled oats & mango |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 454 kcal | 402 kcal |
| Fat | 22.4 g | 16.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.1 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 27.6 g | 27.4 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 11 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Apple, Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rolled oats & mango has 11% fewer calories (402 kcal vs 454 kcal).
- Rolled oats & mango has 25% less fat (16.9 g vs 22.4 g).
- Rolled oats & mango has 38% less saturated fat (6.3 g vs 10.1 g).
- Rolled oats & mango has 74% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Flapjack s brusinkami has 32% more protein (7.4 g vs 5 g).
- Rolled oats & mango has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rolled oats & mango lists: Apple, Gluten.
Ingredients
Flapjack s brusinkami
Bezlepkové vločky, sirup z invertního cukru, rostlinný olej (palmový**, řepkový), cukr, sójová mouka, lyofilizované brusinky (1,3 %), jedlá sůl, přírodní aroma.
Rolled oats & mango
_Oats_ (40%),Vegetable Oils (Palm Oil, Rapeseed Oil), Golden Syrup, vegetable Glycerine, Apple (35%) (Apple, Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid), _Soy_ Flour, Mango 3% (Mango, Sugar, Acid: Citric Acid), Flavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flapjack s brusinkami or Rolled oats & mango?
Overall, Rolled oats & mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rolled oats & mango has fewer calories: 402 kcal versus 454 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rolled oats & mango has less sugar: 27.4 g versus 27.6 g per 100 g.