Filets de rouget barbet vs Filet de rouget barbet
Overall, Filets de rouget barbet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de rouget barbet | Filet de rouget barbet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17.3 g | 12.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de rouget barbet has 23% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- Filets de rouget barbet has 82% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Filets de rouget barbet has 28% more protein (17.3 g vs 12.4 g).
- Only Filets de rouget barbet lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de rouget barbet
Rouget barbet (poisson), Traces éventuelles de mollusques et crustacés,
Filet de rouget barbet
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de rouget barbet or Filet de rouget barbet?
Overall, Filets de rouget barbet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de rouget barbet has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de rouget barbet has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.