Comparison
Filets de merlan vs Filet de merlan
Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de merlan | Filet de merlan |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 72 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de merlan has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
- Only Filets de merlan lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de merlan
Filets de merlan (Merlangius merlangus).
Filet de merlan
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de merlan or Filet de merlan?
Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de merlan has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de merlan has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filet de merlan
Filets de Merlan vs Filet de merlan
Filets de merlan vs Filet de Merlan sans pea...
Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filets de merlan
Filets de Merlan vs Filets de merlan
Filet de merlan vs Filet de merlan
Filets de merlan vs Filet de merlan
Filet de merlan vs Filet de merlan