Comparison

Filets de merlan vs Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête

Overall, Filets de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
Filets de merlan

Filets de merlan

Sélection Cornic · 500 g
a NOVA 1
Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête

Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête

Leroy · 200 g
a NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de merlanFilet de Merlan sans peau sa...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 72 kcal 79 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 17 g 18.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de merlan has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Filets de merlan

Filets de merlan (Merlangius merlangus).

Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête

100% Merlangius merlangus

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de merlan or Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête?

Overall, Filets de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de merlan has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Filets de merlan vs Filet de merlan Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filet de Merlan sans pea... Filets de Merlan vs Filet de Merlan sans pea... Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filets de merlan Filets de Merlan vs Filets de merlan Filet de Merlan sans pea... vs Filet de merlan Filets de merlan vs Filet de merlan Filet de merlan vs Filet de Merlan sans pea...