Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête
Overall, Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Merlan Filets surgelés
Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Merlan Filets surgelés | Filet de Merlan sans peau sa... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 18.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has 45% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 144 kcal).
- Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.5 g).
- Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has 70% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Merlan Filets surgelés has 20% more protein (23.5 g vs 18.8 g).
Ingredients
Merlan Filets surgelés
100% Poisson, contient des arêtes FAO 27.6
Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête
100% Merlangius merlangus
FAQ
Which is healthier: Merlan Filets surgelés or Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête?
Overall, Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Merlan Filets surgelés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.