Comparison

Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filet de merlan

Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMerlan Filets surgelésFilet de merlan
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 144 kcal 79 kcal
Fat 5.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.3 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 23.5 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de merlan has 45% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 144 kcal).
  • Filet de merlan has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Filet de merlan has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Merlan Filets surgelés has no sugar, while Filet de merlan has 0.3 g.
  • Filet de merlan has no salt, while Merlan Filets surgelés has 0.5 g.
  • Merlan Filets surgelés has 19% more protein (23.5 g vs 19 g).
  • Only Merlan Filets surgelés lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Merlan Filets surgelés

100% Poisson, contient des arêtes FAO 27.6

Filet de merlan

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Merlan Filets surgelés or Filet de merlan?

Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de merlan has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Merlan Filets surgelés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons