Comparison
Filet de merlan vs Filet de merlan
Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de merlan | Filet de merlan |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 18.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de merlan has no sugar, while Filet de merlan has 0.3 g.
- Only Filet de merlan lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de merlan
Not available.
Filet de merlan
Merlan
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de merlan or Filet de merlan?
Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de merlan has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de merlan has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Filets de merlan vs Filet de merlan
Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filet de merlan
Filets de Merlan vs Filet de merlan
Filet de merlan vs Filet de merlan
Filet de Merlan sans pea... vs Filet de merlan
Filets de merlan vs Filet de merlan
Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filet de merlan
Filets de Merlan vs Filet de merlan