Comparison

Merlan Filets surgelés vs Filets de merlan

Overall, Filets de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMerlan Filets surgelésFilets de merlan
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 144 kcal 72 kcal
Fat 5.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 23.5 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de merlan has 50% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 144 kcal).
  • Filets de merlan has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Filets de merlan has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Filets de merlan has 63% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Filets de merlan has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Merlan Filets surgelés has 28% more protein (23.5 g vs 17 g).

Ingredients

Merlan Filets surgelés

100% Poisson, contient des arêtes FAO 27.6

Filets de merlan

Filets de merlan (Merlangius merlangus).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Merlan Filets surgelés or Filets de merlan?

Overall, Filets de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de merlan has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Merlan Filets surgelés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons