Filets de hareng fumés doux vs Zarte Filets vom Hering
Overall, Filets de hareng fumés doux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Filets de hareng fumés doux
Zarte Filets vom Hering
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de hareng fumés doux | Zarte Filets vom Hering |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 218 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 16.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de hareng fumés doux has 13% less fat (14 g vs 16.1 g).
- Filets de hareng fumés doux has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Zarte Filets vom Hering has 72% less salt (1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Filets de hareng fumés doux has 60% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.3 g).
- Filets de hareng fumés doux has 33% more protein (18 g vs 12 g).
- Zarte Filets vom Hering has the better Nutri-Score.
- Filets de hareng fumés doux is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filets de hareng fumés doux
Filets de harengs (Clupea harengus), sel (4% en moyenne sur produit fini).
Zarte Filets vom Hering
Heringsfilets (60 %), Tomatenmark (14%), Wasser, Rapsöl, Zucker, Branntweinessig, modifizierte Stärke, Speisesalz, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl, Johannisbrotkernmehl; Gewürze.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de hareng fumés doux or Zarte Filets vom Hering?
Overall, Filets de hareng fumés doux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de hareng fumés doux has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 218 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de hareng fumés doux has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.