Filets de haddock fumés vs Hareng fumé
Overall, Filets de haddock fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de haddock fumés | Hareng fumé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 74 kcal | 167 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de haddock fumés has 56% fewer calories (74 kcal vs 167 kcal).
- Filets de haddock fumés has no fat, while Hareng fumé has 11 g.
- Filets de haddock fumés has no saturated fat, while Hareng fumé has 2.6 g.
- Filets de haddock fumés has 23% less salt (3.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Filets de haddock fumés has the better Nutri-Score.
- Hareng fumé is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Hareng fumé lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de haddock fumés
Filets d’églefin, Rocou E160B, sel.
Hareng fumé
Hareng (Clupea harengus) (poisson) pêché au chalut et/ou au filet tournant et filet soulevé en Océan Atlantique Nord-Est A027, sel, fumé au bois de hêtre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de haddock fumés or Hareng fumé?
Overall, Filets de haddock fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de haddock fumés has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de haddock fumés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.