Comparison

Filet de Merlu blanc du Cap façon meunière vs Filets de merlu du cap

Overall, Filets de merlu du cap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de Merlu blanc du Cap...Filets de merlu du cap
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 156 kcal 73 kcal
Fat 7.1 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.3 g
Sugars 2.1 g 0 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0.7 g 0 g
Protein 15 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, Gluten, MilkFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de merlu du cap has 53% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 156 kcal).
  • Filets de merlu du cap has 86% less fat (1 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Filets de merlu du cap has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Filets de merlu du cap has no sugar, while Filet de Merlu blanc du Cap façon meunière has 2.1 g.
  • Filets de merlu du cap has 52% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Filet de Merlu blanc du Cap façon meunière has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Filet de Merlu blanc du Cap façon meunière lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Filet de Merlu blanc du Cap façon meunière

Filet de merlu blanc du Cap (poisson) 80% [Merluccius capensis et Merluccios paradoxus pêché en Atlantique Sud-Est (FAO 47)], farine de blé (gluten) 10%, huile de tournesol, jus de citron concentré, amidon de blé (gluten), sel, huile de citron, levure, persil 0.02%

Filets de merlu du cap

merlu

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de Merlu blanc du Cap façon meunière or Filets de merlu du cap?

Overall, Filets de merlu du cap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de merlu du cap has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 156 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de merlu du cap has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons