Comparison

Filet de merlu au naturel vs Filet de merlu blanc

Overall, Filet de merlu au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de merlu au naturelFilet de merlu blanc
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 112 kcal 202 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 9.8 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0.7 g
Protein 22 g 13 g
Additives03
AllergensFishFish, Gluten, Milk, Merlu blanc

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 45% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 202 kcal).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 77% less fat (2.3 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has no sugar, while Filet de merlu blanc has 0.5 g.
  • Filet de merlu blanc has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Filet de merlu blanc has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 41% more protein (22 g vs 13 g).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Filet de merlu blanc lists: Gluten, Milk, Merlu blanc.

Ingredients

Filet de merlu au naturel

Merlu (Merluccius,Merluccius), eau, sel.

Filet de merlu blanc

_Merlu blanc_ (Merluccius productus) (_poisson_) 67%, enrobage 33%: farine de blé, huile de colza, eau, amidon de _blé_, sel, dextrose, levure, huile de tournesol, huile de palme; poudre à lever (E450, E500, E503), protéine de _lait_, sirop de glucose

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de merlu au naturel or Filet de merlu blanc?

Overall, Filet de merlu au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de merlu au naturel has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 202 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de merlu au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons