Filet de merlu au naturel vs Rodajas de merluza
Overall, Rodajas de merluza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Filet de merlu au naturel
Rodajas de merluza
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de merlu au naturel | Rodajas de merluza |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 16.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rodajas de merluza has 27% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 112 kcal).
- Rodajas de merluza has 35% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Filet de merlu au naturel has no sugar, while Rodajas de merluza has 0.5 g.
- Rodajas de merluza has 71% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Rodajas de merluza has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Filet de merlu au naturel has 26% more protein (22 g vs 16.3 g).
- Rodajas de merluza is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filet de merlu au naturel
Merlu (Merluccius,Merluccius), eau, sel.
Rodajas de merluza
RODAJAS MERLUZA ARGENTINA (Merluccius hubbsi)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de merlu au naturel or Rodajas de merluza?
Overall, Rodajas de merluza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rodajas de merluza has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de merlu au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.