Comparison

Filet de merlu au naturel vs Mimos de Pescada do Cabo

Overall, Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de merlu au naturelMimos de Pescada do Cabo
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 112 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 22 g 15.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has 31% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 112 kcal).
  • Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has 35% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 28% more protein (22 g vs 15.8 g).
  • Only Filet de merlu au naturel lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de merlu au naturel

Merlu (Merluccius,Merluccius), eau, sel.

Mimos de Pescada do Cabo

Pescada do Cabo

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de merlu au naturel or Mimos de Pescada do Cabo?

Overall, Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de merlu au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons