Filet de merlu blanc vs Mimos de Pescada do Cabo
Overall, Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de merlu blanc | Mimos de Pescada do Cabo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 202 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 15.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Merlu blanc | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has 62% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 202 kcal).
- Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has 85% less fat (1.5 g vs 9.8 g).
- Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has no sugar, while Filet de merlu blanc has 0.5 g.
- Filet de merlu blanc has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has 18% more protein (15.8 g vs 13 g).
- Only Filet de merlu blanc lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk, Merlu blanc.
Ingredients
Filet de merlu blanc
_Merlu blanc_ (Merluccius productus) (_poisson_) 67%, enrobage 33%: farine de blé, huile de colza, eau, amidon de _blé_, sel, dextrose, levure, huile de tournesol, huile de palme; poudre à lever (E450, E500, E503), protéine de _lait_, sirop de glucose
Mimos de Pescada do Cabo
Pescada do Cabo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de merlu blanc or Mimos de Pescada do Cabo?
Overall, Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 202 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mimos de Pescada do Cabo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.