Comparison

Filet de merlu au naturel vs Lombos de Pescada do Cabo

Overall, Lombos de Pescada do Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de merlu au naturelLombos de Pescada do Cabo
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 112 kcal 74 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 22 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lombos de Pescada do Cabo has 34% fewer calories (74 kcal vs 112 kcal).
  • Lombos de Pescada do Cabo has 52% less fat (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Lombos de Pescada do Cabo has no salt, while Filet de merlu au naturel has 0.8 g.
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 27% more protein (22 g vs 16 g).
  • Only Filet de merlu au naturel lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de merlu au naturel

Merlu (Merluccius,Merluccius), eau, sel.

Lombos de Pescada do Cabo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de merlu au naturel or Lombos de Pescada do Cabo?

Overall, Lombos de Pescada do Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lombos de Pescada do Cabo has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de merlu au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons