Comparison

Filet de merlu au naturel vs Ovas de Pescada Peixaria

Overall, Filet de merlu au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de merlu au naturelOvas de Pescada Peixaria
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 112 kcal 136 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 5.3 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 22 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 18% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 136 kcal).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 57% less fat (2.3 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 67% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has no sugar, while Ovas de Pescada Peixaria has 0.5 g.
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has 46% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Filet de merlu au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filet de merlu au naturel lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de merlu au naturel

Merlu (Merluccius,Merluccius), eau, sel.

Ovas de Pescada Peixaria

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de merlu au naturel or Ovas de Pescada Peixaria?

Overall, Filet de merlu au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de merlu au naturel has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de merlu au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons