Filet de merlu au naturel vs Ovas de Pescada Peixaria
Overall, Filet de merlu au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filet de merlu au naturel
Ovas de Pescada Peixaria
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de merlu au naturel | Ovas de Pescada Peixaria |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 136 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de merlu au naturel has 18% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 136 kcal).
- Filet de merlu au naturel has 57% less fat (2.3 g vs 5.3 g).
- Filet de merlu au naturel has 67% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
- Filet de merlu au naturel has no sugar, while Ovas de Pescada Peixaria has 0.5 g.
- Filet de merlu au naturel has 46% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Filet de merlu au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filet de merlu au naturel lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de merlu au naturel
Merlu (Merluccius,Merluccius), eau, sel.
Ovas de Pescada Peixaria
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de merlu au naturel or Ovas de Pescada Peixaria?
Overall, Filet de merlu au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de merlu au naturel has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de merlu au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.