Filet de merlu vs Filets de merlu
Overall, Filet de merlu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Filet de merlu
Filets de merlu
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de merlu | Filets de merlu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 207 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de merlu has 46% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 207 kcal).
- Filet de merlu has 74% less fat (2.3 g vs 9 g).
- Filet de merlu has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Filet de merlu has no sugar, while Filets de merlu has 0.8 g.
- Filets de merlu has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Filet de merlu has 41% more protein (22 g vs 13 g).
- Only Filet de merlu lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de merlu
_Merlu_, eau, sel de mer, thym*, graines de fenouil*, persil*, laurier*. *0.02% des ingrédients sont issus de l'agriculture biologique
Filets de merlu
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de merlu or Filets de merlu?
Overall, Filet de merlu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de merlu has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de merlu has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.