Filet de merlan vs Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête
Overall, Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filet de merlan
Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de merlan | Filet de Merlan sans peau sa... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 18.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has no sugar, while Filet de merlan has 0.3 g.
- Only Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de merlan
Not available.
Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête
100% Merlangius merlangus
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de merlan or Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête?
Overall, Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de merlan has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de Merlan sans peau sans arête has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.