Filet de bar BIO vs Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Filet de bar BIO
Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de bar BIO | Saumon Atlantique au naturel... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 169 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 8.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.3 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bar BIO has 43% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 169 kcal).
- Filet de bar BIO has 76% less fat (2.1 g vs 8.7 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has 80% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.4 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has 78% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes has 12% more protein (22 g vs 19.3 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has the better Nutri-Score.
- Filet de bar BIO is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filet de bar BIO
100 % Dicentrarchus labrax
Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes
Saumon atlantique d'élevage (Salmo salar) - eau - sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de bar BIO or Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes?
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bar BIO has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de bar BIO has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.