Comparison

Filet de bar BIO vs Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes

Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de bar BIOSaumon Atlantique au naturel...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 96 kcal 169 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 8.7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 2.4 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 19.3 g 22 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de bar BIO has 43% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 169 kcal).
  • Filet de bar BIO has 76% less fat (2.1 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Filet de bar BIO has 80% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Filet de bar BIO has 78% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes has 12% more protein (22 g vs 19.3 g).
  • Filet de bar BIO has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Filet de bar BIO is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Filet de bar BIO

100 % Dicentrarchus labrax

Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes

Saumon atlantique d'élevage (Salmo salar) - eau - sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de bar BIO or Saumon Atlantique au naturel sans peau sans arêtes?

Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de bar BIO has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de bar BIO has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons