Filet de bar BIO vs Filet de Bar Fumé Tranché
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de bar BIO | Filet de Bar Fumé Tranché |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 135 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19.3 g | 21.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bar BIO has 28% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 135 kcal).
- Filet de bar BIO has 59% less fat (2.1 g vs 5.2 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has 65% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has 91% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Filet de Bar Fumé Tranché has 11% more protein (21.7 g vs 19.3 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has the better Nutri-Score.
- Filet de bar BIO is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filet de bar BIO
100 % Dicentrarchus labrax
Filet de Bar Fumé Tranché
Bar d'élevage (Dicentrarchus labrax), sel sec.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de bar BIO or Filet de Bar Fumé Tranché?
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bar BIO has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 135 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de bar BIO has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.