Filet de bar BIO vs 2 pavés de Truite Bio
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de bar BIO | 2 pavés de Truite Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 137 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.3 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bar BIO has 30% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 137 kcal).
- Filet de bar BIO has 66% less fat (2.1 g vs 6.3 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has 69% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
Ingredients
Filet de bar BIO
100 % Dicentrarchus labrax
2 pavés de Truite Bio
TRUITE arc - en - ciel ( oncorhynchus mykiss ) élevée en France, issue de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de bar BIO or 2 pavés de Truite Bio?
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bar BIO has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de bar BIO has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.