Comparison

Filet de Bar Bio vs Filet de bar BIO

Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de Bar BioFilet de bar BIO
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 144 kcal 96 kcal
Fat 5.5 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 23.5 g 19.3 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de bar BIO has 33% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 144 kcal).
  • Filet de bar BIO has 61% less fat (2.1 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Filet de bar BIO has 60% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Filet de bar BIO has 59% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Filet de Bar Bio has 18% more protein (23.5 g vs 19.3 g).

Ingredients

Filet de Bar Bio

100 % Dicentrarchus labrax (_poisson_)

Filet de bar BIO

100 % Dicentrarchus labrax

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de Bar Bio or Filet de bar BIO?

Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de bar BIO has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de Bar Bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons