Filet de Bar Bio vs Filet de bar BIO
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de Bar Bio | Filet de bar BIO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 19.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bar BIO has 33% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 144 kcal).
- Filet de bar BIO has 61% less fat (2.1 g vs 5.5 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has 60% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Filet de bar BIO has 59% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Filet de Bar Bio has 18% more protein (23.5 g vs 19.3 g).
Ingredients
Filet de Bar Bio
100 % Dicentrarchus labrax (_poisson_)
Filet de bar BIO
100 % Dicentrarchus labrax
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de Bar Bio or Filet de bar BIO?
Overall, Filet de bar BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bar BIO has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de Bar Bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.