Feuilles de filo 250g vs Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev
Overall, Feuilles de filo 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Feuilles de filo 250g | Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Are... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 290 kcal | 283 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 6.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 5.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Feuilles de filo 250g has 82% less fat (1.1 g vs 6.2 g).
- Feuilles de filo 250g has 73% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev has 77% less sugar (0.9 g vs 4 g).
- Feuilles de filo 250g has 70% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.6 g).
- Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev has 51% more fiber (4.1 g vs 2 g).
- Feuilles de filo 250g has 37% more protein (9 g vs 5.7 g).
- Feuilles de filo 250g has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Feuilles de filo 250g
Farine de BLE ( farine de BLE, GLUTEN DE BLE ), eau, amidon de maïs, sel, conservateur : sorbate de potassium, agent de traitement de la farine : l cystéine
Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev
Farine de _blé_, eau, amidon de maïs, huile de tournesol, sel, conservateur : E202.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Feuilles de filo 250g or Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev?
Overall, Feuilles de filo 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev has fewer calories: 283 kcal versus 290 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kadaif 500 GR S. V. X 20 Arev has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 4 g per 100 g.