Comparison

Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine vs Frutos Secos Miolo de Noz

Overall, Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFarine d'amande blanchie - M...Frutos Secos Miolo de Noz
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 2 —
Calories 607 kcal 699 kcal
Fat 50 g 66.9 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 7.8 g
Sugars 4.5 g 1.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 9.3 g 6.8 g
Protein 22 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensNuts, FarineNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has 13% fewer calories (607 kcal vs 699 kcal).
  • Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has 25% less fat (50 g vs 66.9 g).
  • Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has 44% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Frutos Secos Miolo de Noz has 67% less sugar (1.5 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has 27% more fiber (9.3 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has 27% more protein (22 g vs 16 g).
  • Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine lists: Nuts, Farine.

Ingredients

Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine

Amandes blanchies.

Frutos Secos Miolo de Noz

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine or Frutos Secos Miolo de Noz?

Overall, Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Farine d'amande blanchie - Mouture ultrafine has fewer calories: 607 kcal versus 699 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Frutos Secos Miolo de Noz has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons