Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt vs Snack mix
Overall, Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt
Snack mix
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea... | Snack mix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 647 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 55.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 7.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 5.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 22.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Peanuts | Nuts, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has 74% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 647 kcal).
- Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has 77% less fat (13 g vs 55.7 g).
- Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has 66% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 7.4 g).
- Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has 63% less sugar (2 g vs 5.4 g).
- Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has 72% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Snack mix has 86% more fiber (7 g vs 1 g).
- Snack mix has 77% more protein (22.1 g vs 5 g).
- Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt
Cashews, peanut Oil, sea Salt
Snack mix
27,2% cacahuètes (arachides), 26,9% noix de cajou, 23,9% amandes, 9,6% noix de pécan, 8,9% noix de Macadamia, huile de tournesol, 0,77% sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt or Snack mix?
Overall, Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 647 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fancy Whole Cashews with Sea Salt has less sugar: 2 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.