Comparison
Edame beans vs Alubia roja
Overall, Alubia roja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edame beans | Alubia roja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 196 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 11.7 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 18.9 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 21.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edame beans has 33% fewer calories (196 kcal vs 292 kcal).
- Alubia roja has 91% less fat (1 g vs 11.7 g).
- Alubia roja has 85% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2 g).
- Edame beans has 26% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
- Alubia roja has 68% more fiber (18.9 g vs 6 g).
- Alubia roja has 33% more protein (21.4 g vs 14.4 g).
Ingredients
Edame beans
Edamame soya beans Ingredients Edamame Soya Beans (100%) Allergy advice For allergens see ingredients in bold.
Alubia roja
Feijão encarnado
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edame beans or Alubia roja?
Overall, Alubia roja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edame beans has fewer calories: 196 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edame beans has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.