Dinkelflocken zarte vs Dinkelflocken
Overall, Dinkelflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dinkelflocken zarte | Dinkelflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.3 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkelflocken has 67% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Dinkelflocken has 26% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
- Dinkelflocken zarte has 12% more fiber (9.3 g vs 8.2 g).
- Only Dinkelflocken zarte lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Dinkelflocken zarte
Dinkelflocken.
Dinkelflocken
Dinkelkornflocken
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dinkelflocken zarte or Dinkelflocken?
Overall, Dinkelflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkelflocken has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dinkelflocken has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.