Comparison
Daurade vs Sea bream fillet
Overall, Daurade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Daurade | Sea bream fillet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 10.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 19.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Daurade has 57% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 177 kcal).
- Daurade has 90% less fat (1 g vs 10.3 g).
- Daurade has no saturated fat, while Sea bream fillet has 2.1 g.
- Daurade has no sugar, while Sea bream fillet has 0.9 g.
- Daurade has no salt, while Sea bream fillet has 0.7 g.
- Sea bream fillet has 14% more protein (19.8 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Daurade
Not available.
Sea bream fillet
sea bream fillet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Daurade or Sea bream fillet?
Overall, Daurade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Daurade has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Daurade has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.