Comparison
Filet de dorade vs Daurade
Overall, Daurade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de dorade | Daurade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 89 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Daurade has 13% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 89 kcal).
- Daurade has 33% less fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Daurade has no saturated fat, while Filet de dorade has 0.5 g.
- Filet de dorade has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Filet de dorade
Not available.
Daurade
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de dorade or Daurade?
Overall, Daurade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Daurade has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de dorade has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.