Comparison
Filet de Dorade sébaste vs Filet de dorade
Overall, Filet de dorade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de Dorade sébaste | Filet de dorade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de dorade has 29% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Filet de dorade has 65% less fat (1.5 g vs 4.3 g).
- Filet de dorade has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Filet de Dorade sébaste has 12% more protein (21.5 g vs 19 g).
Ingredients
Filet de Dorade sébaste
Not available.
Filet de dorade
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de Dorade sébaste or Filet de dorade?
Overall, Filet de dorade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de dorade has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de dorade has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.