Comparison
Daurade vs Dorade royale
Overall, Daurade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Daurade | Dorade royale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 7.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 20.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Daurade has 49% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 151 kcal).
- Daurade has 87% less fat (1 g vs 7.8 g).
- Daurade has no saturated fat, while Dorade royale has 1.6 g.
- Dorade royale has 15% more protein (20.1 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Daurade
Not available.
Dorade royale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Daurade or Dorade royale?
Overall, Daurade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Daurade has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Daurade has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.