Comparison

Curry jaune d’aubergines vs Aubergines Farcies au riz

Overall, Curry jaune d’aubergines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCurry jaune d’auberginesAubergines Farcies au riz
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 63 kcal 97 kcal
Fat 5 g 8.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1 g
Sugars 1.7 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 1 g
Fiber 2 g 1.5 g
Protein 0.9 g 0.2 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Curry jaune d’aubergines has 35% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 97 kcal).
  • Curry jaune d’aubergines has 39% less fat (5 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Curry jaune d’aubergines has no saturated fat, while Aubergines Farcies au riz has 1 g.
  • Aubergines Farcies au riz has no sugar, while Curry jaune d’aubergines has 1.7 g.
  • Curry jaune d’aubergines has 26% more fiber (2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Curry jaune d’aubergines has 81% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Curry jaune d’aubergines has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Curry jaune d’aubergines

Aubergines* 60%, eau, lait de coco*, huile de tournesol vierge*, gingembre*, vinaigre d'alcool*, sel marin non raffine, jus de citron*, épices curry poudre* 0,3%, sucre de canne roux *Ingrédients agricoles issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.

Aubergines Farcies au riz

AUBERGINE, RIZ, OIGNONS, HUILE DE TOURNESOL, TOMATES, EAU, SEL, ACIDE CITRIQUE (E 330), ÉPICES

FAQ

Which is healthier: Curry jaune d’aubergines or Aubergines Farcies au riz?

Overall, Curry jaune d’aubergines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Curry jaune d’aubergines has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 97 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aubergines Farcies au riz has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons