Crunchy Fava-Snack salted vs Kichererbsen
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crunchy Fava-Snack salted | Kichererbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 492 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12.4 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kichererbsen has 74% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 492 kcal).
- Kichererbsen has 92% less fat (2.2 g vs 27 g).
- Kichererbsen has 88% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2.6 g).
- Kichererbsen has 76% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kichererbsen has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
- Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 57% more fiber (12.4 g vs 5.4 g).
- Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 71% more protein (25 g vs 7.3 g).
- Kichererbsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Crunchy Fava-Snack salted lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Crunchy Fava-Snack salted
fava beans (33%), almonds (28%), chickpeas (25%), sunflower oil, salt
Kichererbsen
Kichererbsen (enthält Sulfite), Wasser.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crunchy Fava-Snack salted or Kichererbsen?
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kichererbsen has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 492 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kichererbsen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.