Comparison

Crunchy Fava-Snack salted vs Kichererbsen

Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrunchy Fava-Snack saltedKichererbsen
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 492 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 27 g 2.2 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 0.3 g
Sugars 2.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.2 g 0 g
Fiber 12.4 g 5.4 g
Protein 25 g 7.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kichererbsen has 74% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 492 kcal).
  • Kichererbsen has 92% less fat (2.2 g vs 27 g).
  • Kichererbsen has 88% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Kichererbsen has 76% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Kichererbsen has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 57% more fiber (12.4 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 71% more protein (25 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Kichererbsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Crunchy Fava-Snack salted lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Crunchy Fava-Snack salted

fava beans (33%), almonds (28%), chickpeas (25%), sunflower oil, salt

Kichererbsen

Kichererbsen (enthält Sulfite), Wasser.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crunchy Fava-Snack salted or Kichererbsen?

Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kichererbsen has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 492 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kichererbsen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons