Comparison

Croquetas de pollo Monissa vs Croquetas de boletus

Overall, Croquetas de boletus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCroquetas de pollo MonissaCroquetas de boletus
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 181 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 7.3 g 4.5 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 3.4 g
Sugars 4.1 g 3.3 g
Salt 0.7 g 1 g
Fiber — 1.4 g
Protein 6.2 g 4.8 g
Additives11
AllergensGlutenGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croquetas de boletus has 10% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 181 kcal).
  • Croquetas de boletus has 38% less fat (4.5 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Croquetas de pollo Monissa has 68% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Croquetas de boletus has 20% less sugar (3.3 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Croquetas de pollo Monissa has 23% more protein (6.2 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Croquetas de boletus is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Croquetas de boletus lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Croquetas de pollo Monissa

Agua, 17% carne de pollo, harina de trigo, pan rallado suero lácteo, aceite de girasol, almidón de maíz, sal, aromas, aromas de humo, estabilizante: carragenanos

Croquetas de boletus

Leche entera, boletus edulis (20%), harina de trigo, aceite vegetal de girasol, cebolla frita (cebolla, aceite de oliva, sal, corrector de acidez ( acido citrico), sal, ajo, aceite de oliva, empanado (harina de trigo y pan rallado levadura y agua)).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Croquetas de pollo Monissa or Croquetas de boletus?

Overall, Croquetas de boletus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Croquetas de boletus has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croquetas de boletus has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons