Comparison

Croquetas de boletus vs Croqueta De Pollo

Overall, Croquetas de boletus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCroquetas de boletusCroqueta De Pollo
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 162 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 4.5 g 11 g
Saturated fat 3.4 g 1.5 g
Sugars 3.3 g 4.2 g
Salt 1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 1.4 g 1 g
Protein 4.8 g 5.6 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk, Gluten leche

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croquetas de boletus has 18% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • Croquetas de boletus has 59% less fat (4.5 g vs 11 g).
  • Croqueta De Pollo has 56% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Croquetas de boletus has 21% less sugar (3.3 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Croquetas de boletus has 29% more fiber (1.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Croqueta De Pollo has 14% more protein (5.6 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Only Croqueta De Pollo lists: Gluten leche.

Ingredients

Croquetas de boletus

Leche entera, boletus edulis (20%), harina de trigo, aceite vegetal de girasol, cebolla frita (cebolla, aceite de oliva, sal, corrector de acidez ( acido citrico), sal, ajo, aceite de oliva, empanado (harina de trigo y pan rallado levadura y agua)).

Croqueta De Pollo

Agua, carne de pollo (14%), harina de trigo, cebolla, aceite de girasol, pan rallado (harina de trigo, agua, sal y levadura), almidon de trigo, leche pasteurizada, sal, vinagre de vino, especias.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Croquetas de boletus or Croqueta De Pollo?

Overall, Croquetas de boletus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Croquetas de boletus has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croquetas de boletus has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons