Comparison

Cremig-zartes Hafer-Porridge Schoko vs Porridge au chocolat

Overall, Porridge au chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCremig-zartes Hafer-Porridge...Porridge au chocolat
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 397 kcal 386 kcal
Fat 12 g 8.6 g
Saturated fat 5.6 g 3.1 g
Sugars 15 g 12.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 11 g 10.9 g
Protein 12 g 12.5 g
Additives12
AllergensGluten, MilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Porridge au chocolat has 28% less fat (8.6 g vs 12 g).
  • Porridge au chocolat has 45% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Porridge au chocolat has 16% less sugar (12.6 g vs 15 g).
  • Porridge au chocolat has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Cremig-zartes Hafer-Porridge Schoko lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Cremig-zartes Hafer-Porridge Schoko

Vollkorn-Haferflocken (61%), lösliche Vollkorn-Haferflocken (14%), Zucker, Kakaomasse, Karamellsirup (3%), Vollmilchpulver, Kakaobutter, Süßmolkenpulver, fettarmes Kakaopulver, Emulgator Lecithine. Kann Schalenfrüchte enthalten.

Porridge au chocolat

Flocons d'avoine 78%, chocolat noir 8% (masse de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithines de tournesol), dattes séchées 8% (dattes 95%, farine de riz), chocolat au lait 4% (sucre, lait entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithines de tournesol), inuline de chicorée 2%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cremig-zartes Hafer-Porridge Schoko or Porridge au chocolat?

Overall, Porridge au chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Porridge au chocolat has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Porridge au chocolat has less sugar: 12.6 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons