Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria vs Crema de Verduras
Overall, Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahori... | Crema de Verduras |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria has 64% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Crema de Verduras has 35% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria has 57% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria has 32% more fiber (1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria lists: Soybeans.
- Only Crema de Verduras lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria
Agua, calabaza 24%, zanahoria 17%, patata, puerro, jugo de _soja_ (agua, semilla de _soja_ libre de OGM, sal), aceite de oliva, azúcar, sal, especias, aroma natural.
Crema de Verduras
water, vegetables in variable proportion (carrot, potato, onion, leek, spinach, pea and green beans) 43,5%, olive oil 1,5%, butter, modified corn starch, salt and sugar,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria or Crema de Verduras?
Overall, Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crema De Calabaza Y Zanahoria has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crema de Verduras has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2 g per 100 g.