Comparison

Couscous de Maïs et Riz vs Bio Pufuleti

Overall, Couscous de Maïs et Riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCouscous de Maïs et RizBio Pufuleti
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 362 kcal 438 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 15 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 1.7 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.9 g 1.6 g
Protein 7.3 g 5.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Couscous de Maïs et Riz has 17% fewer calories (362 kcal vs 438 kcal).
  • Couscous de Maïs et Riz has 92% less fat (1.2 g vs 15 g).
  • Couscous de Maïs et Riz has 82% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Bio Pufuleti has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Couscous de Maïs et Riz has 45% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Couscous de Maïs et Riz has 26% more protein (7.3 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Couscous de Maïs et Riz has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Couscous de Maïs et Riz

Farine biologique de mais (70%), farine biologique de riz (30%), eau

Bio Pufuleti

80 g Sorgfältig hergestellt für / Prodotto per/Proizve deno za / Proizvedeno v Romuniji za: SPAR O Warenhandels-AG, Europastr. 3, 5015 PP Österreich, www.spar.at Stavlja na tržište RH: SPAR Hrvatska d.o.o., Slavonsk avenija 50, 10000 Zagreb, Hrvatska, www.spar.hr Prodaja: SPAR Slovenija d.o.o., Letališka 26 SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija, www.spar.si 9100000 785019

FAQ

Which is healthier: Couscous de Maïs et Riz or Bio Pufuleti?

Overall, Couscous de Maïs et Riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Couscous de Maïs et Riz has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 438 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Pufuleti has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons