Couscous biologique de petit épeautre vs Tria Couscous Fin
Overall, Tria Couscous Fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Couscous biologique de petit... | Tria Couscous Fin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tria Couscous Fin has no fat, while Couscous biologique de petit épeautre has 3.9 g.
- Tria Couscous Fin has no saturated fat, while Couscous biologique de petit épeautre has 0.6 g.
- Tria Couscous Fin has no sugar, while Couscous biologique de petit épeautre has 4.2 g.
- Couscous biologique de petit épeautre has 55% more fiber (8.8 g vs 4 g).
- Tria Couscous Fin has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Couscous biologique de petit épeautre
Farine de petit épeautre biologique
Tria Couscous Fin
Semoule de blé dur sélectionnée
FAQ
Which is healthier: Couscous biologique de petit épeautre or Tria Couscous Fin?
Overall, Tria Couscous Fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Couscous biologique de petit épeautre has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tria Couscous Fin has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.